Mosston and Ashworth's teaching styles represent a comprehensive taxonomy that categorizes various approaches educators can adopt to facilitate learning, particularly within physical education, sports, and other experiential learning environments. Their model emphasizes the importance of teacher and student roles, the nature of interaction, and the level of student autonomy. By systematically classifying these styles, educators can better understand how their instructional choices influence learner engagement, motivation, and skill development. This in-depth exploration will examine the origins of the Mosston and Ashworth teaching styles, detail the different categories within their taxonomy, analyze the characteristics of each style, and discuss practical applications and implications for teaching practice.
---
Origins and Development of the Mosston and Ashworth Teaching Styles
Historical Background
The taxonomy of teaching styles was developed by Sara B. Mosston in the 1960s, with subsequent refinement and expansion by Ellen Ashworth. Mosston's pioneering work aimed to create a systematic framework that would help educators understand the spectrum of instructional methods available, moving beyond traditional teacher-centered approaches. The motivation was to promote more effective, student-centered learning experiences that could be tailored to diverse learners and educational contexts.
Purpose of the Taxonomy
The primary goal of Mosston and Ashworth’s taxonomy is to:
- Provide a structured classification of teaching methods
- Enhance teacher decision-making
- Encourage flexible and adaptable instructional strategies
- Promote active student participation and autonomy
Their work underscores that no single teaching style is universally appropriate; instead, a range of styles should be employed based on learning objectives, student needs, and contextual factors.
---
Categories of Teaching Styles in the Mosston and Ashworth Spectrum
Mosston and Ashworth organized their taxonomy into a spectrum of teaching styles, which are broadly categorized into:
1. Command Styles
2. Practice Styles
3. Reciprocal Styles
4. Self-Check Styles
5. Guided Discovery Styles
6. Convergent Production Styles
7. Divergent Production Styles
8. Individual Program Styles
These categories are arranged along a continuum from teacher-centered to student-centered approaches, reflecting increasing learner independence.
---
Detailed Overview of the Teaching Styles
1. Command Style
Characteristics:
- Teacher-controlled method where the instructor determines what is taught, how it is taught, and when.
- The teacher demonstrates and explains, and students follow instructions precisely.
- Emphasized in early skill learning phases or when safety is a concern.
Advantages:
- Clear guidance for beginners.
- Ensures safety and order.
- Efficient for large groups.
Limitations:
- Limited student autonomy.
- May reduce motivation and creativity over time.
Practical Applications:
- Teaching basic motor skills.
- Conducting drills in sports.
2. Practice Style
Characteristics:
- Students practice skills individually or in small groups.
- Teacher provides feedback but less direct control.
- Focus is on repetition and mastery of skills.
Advantages:
- Allows students to focus on personal improvement.
- Fosters independence in practice.
Limitations:
- Less structured for complex tasks.
- Can be monotonous if not managed well.
Practical Applications:
- Skill refinement.
- Personal skill development sessions.
3. Reciprocal Style
Characteristics:
- Students work in pairs or small groups to observe and give feedback.
- Teacher facilitates and guides peer assessment.
- Promotes communication and social skills.
Advantages:
- Encourages active engagement.
- Develops critical observation skills.
- Fosters peer learning.
Limitations:
- Quality of feedback depends on student understanding.
- May require prior training in feedback methods.
Practical Applications:
- Peer coaching.
- Team-based skill assessments.
4. Self-Check Style
Characteristics:
- Students assess their own performance against set criteria.
- Teachers facilitate the process but do not directly evaluate performance.
Advantages:
- Promotes self-awareness and responsibility.
- Develops reflective skills.
Limitations:
- Requires students to understand assessment criteria.
- May be challenging for less motivated learners.
Practical Applications:
- Self-evaluation during skill practice.
- Developing personal improvement plans.
5. Guided Discovery Style
Characteristics:
- Teacher guides students to discover principles or solutions independently.
- Emphasizes questioning and exploration.
- Students are active participants in learning.
Advantages:
- Enhances problem-solving skills.
- Promotes deeper understanding.
Limitations:
- Time-consuming.
- Requires skilled facilitation.
Practical Applications:
- Learning tactical concepts.
- Exploring movement principles.
6. Convergent Production Style
Characteristics:
- Students produce specific responses based on teacher instructions.
- Focused on achieving a predetermined outcome.
Advantages:
- Useful for skill refinement.
- Clear objectives.
Limitations:
- Limits creativity.
- Teacher-centered.
Practical Applications:
- Drills that require precise execution.
7. Divergent Production Style
Characteristics:
- Students generate multiple solutions to a problem.
- Encourages creativity and personal expression.
Advantages:
- Fosters innovation.
- Develops decision-making skills.
Limitations:
- Less control over outcomes.
- Difficult to assess uniformly.
Practical Applications:
- Creative movement tasks.
- Problem-solving activities.
8. Individual Program Style
Characteristics:
- Students work independently at their own pace and level.
- Programs are tailored to individual needs and goals.
Advantages:
- Highly personalized learning.
- Promotes self-directed learning.
Limitations:
- Demands significant planning.
- Requires motivated and self-disciplined learners.
Practical Applications:
- Personal fitness programs.
- Long-term skill development plans.
---
Implications for Teaching Practice
Flexibility and Adaptability
Mosston and Ashworth’s spectrum encourages teachers to adopt a flexible approach, selecting and shifting between styles based on:
- Learner age and ability
- Learning objectives
- Contextual constraints
- Safety considerations
This adaptability enhances the effectiveness of instruction and caters to diverse learner needs.
Balancing Teacher and Student Roles
A key insight from their taxonomy is understanding the balance between teacher control and student autonomy. While command and practice styles provide structure, more student-centered styles like guided discovery and divergent production foster independence and creativity.
Promoting Learner Autonomy
Progressing from teacher-led to learner-driven styles supports the development of self-regulated learners. Teachers can scaffold instruction, gradually increasing student responsibility and decision-making power.
Assessment and Feedback Strategies
Different styles necessitate varied approaches to assessment:
- Direct observation and feedback in command and practice styles.
- Peer assessment in reciprocal styles.
- Self-assessment in self-check and individual program styles.
Effective assessment reinforces learning and encourages reflection.
---
Practical Applications and Case Studies
Physical Education
In PE classes, teachers can employ a variety of styles:
- Use command style for initial skill teaching.
- Transition to practice and reciprocal styles for skill refinement.
- Incorporate guided discovery for tactical understanding.
- Promote self-check and individual programs for personal fitness goals.
Sports Coaching
Coaches can tailor their instructional approach:
- Use command and practice styles during training drills.
- Implement reciprocal and divergent styles during strategy sessions.
- Encourage athletes to develop individualized training plans.
Other Educational Contexts
Beyond physical education, Mosston and Ashworth’s taxonomy applies to art, music, and academic instruction, emphasizing the universality of their framework.
---
Conclusion
Mosston and Ashworth’s teaching styles provide a comprehensive, flexible framework that emphasizes the dynamic relationship between teacher and learner. By understanding and applying these styles intentionally, educators can create engaging, effective, and inclusive learning environments. Their spectrum encourages educators to move beyond rigid, traditional methods, fostering a culture of exploration, independence, and lifelong learning. Recognizing the strengths and limitations of each style allows for strategic planning, ensuring that instruction aligns with learners’ needs and educational goals. Ultimately, their taxonomy serves as a vital tool for professional growth, curriculum development, and enhancing learner outcomes across diverse educational settings.
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the key teaching styles identified by Mosston and Ashworth?
Mosston and Ashworth identified a spectrum of teaching styles ranging from teacher-centered to student-centered approaches, including styles like command, practice, reciprocal, and self-teaching, among others.
How does the 'Command' style differ from the 'Discovery' style in Mosston and Ashworth's framework?
The 'Command' style involves the teacher directing all aspects of learning with students following instructions, whereas the 'Discovery' style encourages students to explore and find solutions independently with minimal teacher guidance.
Why are Mosston and Ashworth's teaching styles considered important in physical education?
They provide a comprehensive framework that helps teachers select appropriate instructional methods tailored to students' needs, promoting effective learning, skill development, and student autonomy.
Can Mosston and Ashworth's teaching styles be integrated in a single lesson?
Yes, teachers often blend different styles within a lesson to address various learning objectives, adapt to student needs, and create a dynamic and engaging learning environment.
What is the significance of the 'Self-Teaching' style in Mosston and Ashworth's model?
The 'Self-Teaching' style emphasizes student independence, encouraging learners to assess their own performance and take responsibility for their learning, fostering autonomy and lifelong learning skills.
