The phrase "as soon as laws are necessary" is often associated with the insightful observations of eminent philosophers and political theorists who have pondered the nature of law, authority, and human society. While the exact phrase may not be directly attributed verbatim to a single individual, it encapsulates a fundamental idea that has been explored extensively across the centuries: the notion that laws are a response to human tendencies toward disorder, conflict, and the need for regulation. This article aims to explore the origins, interpretations, and implications of this concept, shedding light on who might have originally articulated this idea and how it fits within broader philosophical and political thought.
---
Origins of the Concept
Historical Roots in Political Philosophy
The idea that laws arise out of necessity can be traced back to several influential thinkers in political philosophy:
- Plato and Aristotle: Both emphasized the importance of laws in creating order within the polis (city-state). Aristotle, in particular, argued that laws are necessary to cultivate virtue and prevent chaos.
- Stoic Philosophy: The Stoics believed that natural law is inherent in the universe, and human laws should reflect this divine order.
However, the phrase “as soon as laws are necessary” as a direct quotation is more closely associated with later Enlightenment thinkers who reflected on the origin and purpose of law in human society.
John Locke and the Social Contract
John Locke, a 17th-century English philosopher, is often linked to ideas surrounding the necessity of law:
- Locke posited that individuals in a state of nature possess natural rights but enter into civil society to better secure these rights.
- Laws, in Locke’s view, are enacted because humans recognize the need to regulate their behavior and protect themselves from harm.
- The necessity for laws emerges precisely when natural human tendencies threaten social harmony or individual rights.
While Locke did not explicitly say "as soon as laws are necessary," his writings imply that laws are a pragmatic response to human imperfections and social conflicts.
The Evolution of the Idea in Enlightenment Thought
Baron de Montesquieu and the Separation of Powers
Montesquieu emphasized the importance of structured laws to prevent tyranny and maintain liberty:
- He believed that laws are necessary to balance power within a state.
- For Montesquieu, laws are not just reactive but foundational to the stability of political institutions.
Though he did not phrase it exactly as "as soon as laws are necessary," his work underscores the idea that laws are a natural and essential part of organized society, emerging when disorder threatens.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau and the General Will
Rousseau’s social contract theory posited that laws are expressions of the collective will:
- Laws are necessary when individuals come together to form a cohesive community.
- They are rooted in the collective interest, which emerges when individual passions threaten social harmony.
Again, while not a direct quote, Rousseau’s ideas align with the concept that laws are enacted out of necessity to regulate human interactions.
---
Who Said "As Soon as Laws Are Necessary"?
Despite the philosophical background, the specific phrase "as soon as laws are necessary" is often associated with the 20th-century political thinker Hannah Arendt or related interpretations of her work. However, it is more accurately linked to the broader philosophical interpretation of law's origin.
Some scholars attribute similar sentiments to Thomas Hobbes, who famously argued that in the absence of law, life would be "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." Hobbes believed that laws are necessary to escape the chaos of the natural state of mankind.
The Role of Hobbes’ Perspective
- Hobbes’ View: The necessity of laws arises immediately upon recognizing human tendencies toward violence and self-interest.
- Implication: Laws are a societal response to human nature’s darker aspects.
The Contribution of Montesquieu and Others
- Montesquieu, as previously mentioned, believed that laws are necessary to prevent tyranny and maintain liberty.
- These ideas collectively suggest that the moment disorder or conflict appears, laws become essential.
The Influence of Classical and Modern Thinkers
The phrase encapsulates a recurring theme in political thought: that laws are not arbitrary but a practical necessity that emerges when human society faces challenges. While no single figure may have coined this exact phrase, it reflects a synthesis of ideas from:
- Classical philosophers (Plato, Aristotle)
- Enlightenment thinkers (Locke, Montesquieu, Rousseau)
- Modern political theorists (Hannah Arendt, Thomas Hobbes)
---
Implications of the Idea
Law as a Response to Human Nature
The core implication of the phrase is that laws are inherently reactive, emerging when human tendencies toward chaos, conflict, or inequality threaten social stability.
- Human Nature: Many thinkers view humans as naturally self-interested or competitive.
- Necessity of Laws: Laws serve to curb these tendencies and promote order.
Law as a Social Contract
The idea also aligns with the social contract theory:
- Society consents to laws because they are necessary for mutual preservation.
- Laws are a collective agreement to regulate behavior for the common good.
Law and Morality
Another dimension is the relationship between law and morality:
- Laws are often seen as formalized moral rules.
- They are necessary when moral norms are insufficient to prevent harm or disorder.
Modern Perspectives and Critiques
Legal Positivism
Modern legal positivists argue that laws are valid based on their sources, not their moral content:
- The necessity of law is primarily pragmatic.
- Laws are necessary when social order requires regulation, regardless of moral considerations.
Critical Perspectives
Critics highlight that laws can be oppressive or serve particular interests:
- The necessity of laws does not always equate to justice.
- Laws may be enacted out of necessity by those in power, sometimes to suppress dissent.
---
Conclusion
The phrase "as soon as laws are necessary" captures a fundamental truth about human society: laws are a response to the innate tendencies of humans toward disorder, conflict, and self-interest. While no single individual can be definitively credited with coining this exact phrase, it embodies the collective insights of numerous philosophers and political theorists who have reflected on the origins and purpose of law.
From the classical ideas of Aristotle to the modern theories of Hobbes and Locke, the consensus is that laws emerge precisely when human tendencies threaten social harmony. They serve as the framework within which societies organize themselves, regulate behavior, and seek stability.
Understanding this concept is crucial for appreciating the role of law in human life. It reminds us that laws are not arbitrary impositions but necessary responses—tools that help us navigate our nature and societal complexities. Recognizing the origins and implications of this idea allows us to critically assess laws and their application in our world today, ensuring they serve the true purpose of fostering justice, order, and the common good.
---
References & Further Reading
- Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan. (1651)
- Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government. (1689)
- Montesquieu. The Spirit of the Laws. (1748)
- Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Social Contract. (1762)
- Arendt, Hannah. On Violence. (1970)
- Hart, H.L.A. The Concept of Law. (1961)
---
This article provides a comprehensive overview of the philosophical and historical context surrounding the idea that laws are necessary when societal order is at risk. While the exact phrase may not have a singular origin, its essence is woven into the fabric of political thought.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who originally said the quote 'As soon as laws are necessary, they are not anymore'?
The quote is commonly attributed to Émile Durkheim, a renowned sociologist, though its precise origin is debated.
What is the meaning behind the statement 'As soon as laws are necessary, they are not anymore'?
The quote suggests that in a truly just and harmonious society, laws become unnecessary because social order and moral norms naturally prevail.
How does this quote relate to the concept of an ideal society?
It reflects the idea that in an ideal society, social cohesion and shared values eliminate the need for legal enforcement.
Is this quote aligned with any particular political philosophy?
Yes, it aligns with libertarian and utopian ideals that emphasize minimal government intervention and self-regulating social norms.
Has this quote been referenced or discussed in modern legal or social theory?
Yes, it appears in discussions about the role of laws and whether a truly just society can exist without strict legal regulation.
Are there criticisms or limitations to the idea expressed in this quote?
Critics argue that complete reliance on social norms without laws may be unrealistic in complex societies, where laws are necessary to protect rights and maintain order.
How does this quote influence contemporary debates on law and morality?
It encourages debates about whether laws should reflect moral values or if social harmony can exist independently of formal legal systems.
Can this quote be applied to modern governance and legal systems?
While idealistic, it inspires discussions about reducing overly restrictive laws and fostering social trust to achieve harmony without heavy legal oversight.
