The White Man S Burden Poem Meaning

Advertisement

The White Man's Burden poem meaning has been a subject of extensive analysis and debate since it was first published. Written by Rudyard Kipling in 1899, the poem encapsulates the imperialist mindset prevalent during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, reflecting the attitudes and justifications used by Western powers to colonize and dominate other nations. Understanding the meaning behind this poem requires examining its historical context, themes, and the underlying messages Kipling sought to convey. This article delves into the intricate layers of "The White Man's Burden," exploring its significance, interpretations, and the enduring implications of its message.

Historical Context of "The White Man's Burden"



Imperialism and Colonial Expansion


In the late 19th century, Western nations, particularly Britain and the United States, were engaged in a fierce race to expand their empires across Africa, Asia, and the Pacific. This period, often called the "Scramble for Africa" and the "American Empire," was marked by the belief that Western civilization was superior and that it was the duty of Europeans and Americans to civilize "lesser" peoples. Kipling’s poem was a product of this era, aiming to motivate and justify imperialist ventures.

The Philippines and the Spanish-American War


The poem was specifically written in the context of the U.S. annexation of the Philippines after the Spanish-American War of 1898. The United States, emerging as a colonial power, faced the moral and political challenge of justifying its intervention in the Philippines, which was inhabited by predominantly non-European peoples. Kipling’s poem was addressed to the United States, urging it to accept the burdens of empire.

Understanding the Poem’s Core Themes



The Concept of the "Burden"


At its core, "The White Man’s Burden" refers to the supposed moral obligation of Western powers to civilize and uplift non-Western peoples. Kipling portrays this "burden" as a heavy, noble duty—one fraught with difficulties, sacrifices, and challenges. The poem suggests that imperialism is not driven by greed but by a sense of noble responsibility.

Racial and Cultural Superiority


The poem explicitly and implicitly promotes a racial hierarchy, positioning Westerners as superior and tasked with bringing "progress" to "sullen peoples." Phrases like "Send forth the best ye breed" imply a belief in cultural superiority and a duty to impose Western values and civilization on others.

Morality and Sacrifice


Kipling emphasizes the moral righteousness of the imperialist mission, portraying it as a selfless act that requires sacrifice. The lines "Take up the white man's burden— / Send forth the best ye breed—" suggest a moral duty that demands endurance and resilience.

Line-by-Line Analysis of the Poem



To fully grasp the meaning, it’s helpful to analyze key sections of the poem:

Opening Lines


> "Take up the white man’s burden—
> Send forth the best ye breed—
> Go bind your sons to exile
> To serve your captives’ need—"

These lines introduce the central theme: Western nations are called to take on a moral duty ("white man’s burden") by sending their best and brightest to serve and civilize non-Western peoples, even at personal cost.

Portrayal of the Non-Western Peoples


> "Half-devil and half-child."

This phrase reflects the paternalistic and racist view that colonized peoples are uncivilized, childlike, or even morally inferior, reinforcing the racial hierarchy underpinning imperialism.

The Moral Challenge


> "The blame of those ye better,
> The hate of silence set on stone—
> And bid your sons to exile,"

Kipling suggests that the imperialists bear the burden of moral responsibility for those they "better" but also face hatred and misunderstanding.

Multiple Interpretations of the Poem's Meaning



Literal Interpretation


From a literal perspective, the poem advocates for Western nations to undertake the civilizing mission, emphasizing duty, sacrifice, and moral responsibility. It portrays imperialism as a noble endeavor, justified by the supposed benefits to colonized peoples.

Critique and Controversy


Many critics argue that the poem masks underlying imperialist greed and racial superiority. It romanticizes domination and ignores the violence, exploitation, and cultural destruction wrought by colonial powers.

Post-Colonial Perspective


From a post-colonial lens, "The White Man’s Burden" is seen as a justification for oppression, a paternalistic narrative that dehumanizes colonized peoples and promotes Western superiority. It serves as a reminder of the ideological justifications used to legitimize imperialism.

Symbolism and Literary Devices in the Poem



Use of Rhetorical Devices


Kipling employs repetition, rhyme, and parallelism to reinforce the poem's message. The repeated phrase "Take up the white man’s burden" emphasizes duty and moral obligation.

Imagery and Tone


The tone is paternalistic and condescending, with imagery depicting colonized peoples as burdens or children who need guidance. The poem’s tone elevates imperialism as a moral imperative, albeit with a sense of foreboding and hardship.

Metaphors and Symbols


- "White man’s burden": symbolizes the perceived moral obligation of Westerners.
- "Send forth the best ye breed": suggests reproducing a superior race or culture.
- "Exile": metaphor for the sacrifices and hardships of imperialist missions.

Legacy and Modern Interpretations



Impact on Public Perception


The poem played a significant role in shaping public opinion in Western countries, framing imperialism as a noble enterprise. It was widely circulated and cited as justification for colonial policies.

Criticism in Contemporary Times


Today, Kipling’s poem is often criticized for its racist, paternalistic tone and its endorsement of imperialism. It is viewed as a reflection of colonial arrogance and moral superiority, which contributed to centuries of oppression and exploitation.

Relevance in Modern Discourse


While the explicit racist rhetoric of the poem is widely condemned, discussions around "The White Man’s Burden" continue in debates over cultural imperialism, globalization, and the moral responsibilities of powerful nations.

Conclusion: The Meaning and Moral of the Poem


"The White Man’s Burden" is a complex and controversial poem that encapsulates the imperialist ideology of its time. Its meaning revolves around the idea that Western powers had a moral duty to civilize and uplift non-Western peoples, a notion rooted in racial superiority and paternalism. While it was intended to inspire a sense of duty and sacrifice, it also perpetuated harmful stereotypes and justified exploitation. Understanding this poem involves recognizing both its historical context and its lasting implications, serving as a reminder of the ways language and literature have been used to shape perceptions of race, morality, and empire. Modern readers often view it as a symbol of colonial arrogance, prompting critical reflection on the legacies of imperialism and the importance of cultural humility.

Frequently Asked Questions


What is the main theme of 'The White Man's Burden' poem?

The main theme of the poem is the perceived duty of Western imperialists, especially Americans and Europeans, to civilize and govern non-white populations, often viewed as a burden or responsibility.

Who wrote 'The White Man's Burden' and when was it published?

The poem was written by Rudyard Kipling and was published in 1899.

What is the significance of the phrase 'White Man's Burden'?

The phrase signifies the supposed moral obligation of white Western nations to civilize and dominate other peoples, often justified by a sense of racial superiority.

How does the poem reflect the attitudes of its time?

The poem reflects the imperialist mindset of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, portraying colonization as a noble but challenging duty that requires sacrifice from the colonizers.

Is 'The White Man's Burden' considered a critique or endorsement of imperialism?

While some interpret it as an endorsement, many view the poem as a patronizing and paternalistic justification for imperialism, highlighting its condescending view of colonized peoples.

What are some criticisms of the poem today?

Today, critics see the poem as racist, imperialist, and a justification for exploitation and violence against colonized peoples, reflecting colonial arrogance and racial superiority.

How does understanding the poem help in studying colonial history?

Studying the poem provides insight into the ideological justifications used by imperial powers and helps analyze the cultural and racial attitudes that supported colonization.

Has the meaning of 'The White Man's Burden' changed over time?

Yes, it is now largely seen as a symbol of imperialist arrogance and racial superiority, with modern interpretations critiquing its underlying assumptions and implications.

What is the relevance of 'The White Man's Burden' in contemporary discussions?

The poem is relevant today as a historical example of racial and cultural justifications for domination, prompting critical discussions about imperialism, race, and ethics.

Can 'The White Man's Burden' be interpreted as a call for racial equality?

No, the poem is generally viewed as reinforcing racial hierarchies and paternalism, rather than advocating for equality or respect among different cultures.