Summary Of The Story Hills Like White Elephants

Advertisement

Summary of the story Hills Like White Elephants

Ernest Hemingway’s short story "Hills Like White Elephants" is a masterful example of minimalist storytelling, where much of the narrative is conveyed through dialogue and subtle hints rather than explicit exposition. The story's brevity and sparse prose invite readers to interpret the underlying tensions and themes, making it a rich subject for analysis. In this article, we will explore a comprehensive summary of the story, analyzing its plot, characters, themes, symbols, and stylistic features to provide a detailed understanding of Hemingway’s work.

Introduction to the Story



"Hills Like White Elephants" is set at a train station in the Ebro River valley of Spain. The story revolves around a young American couple waiting for a train to Madrid. Their conversation subtly reveals the presence of a serious issue—implied to be an abortion—without explicitly stating so. The story is renowned for its economical language, layered symbolism, and exploration of communication and choice.

Plot Summary



Setting and Characters



The story takes place at a small train station in a rural Spanish landscape. The main characters are:

- The American Man (referred to as "the American"): A man who seems anxious and eager to persuade his partner.
- Jig: The young woman, whose name is never revealed, who appears conflicted and emotionally uncertain.

Other characters are absent, emphasizing the intimacy and tension between the two.

The Initial Scene



The story opens with the couple sitting outside the station, awaiting their train. They engage in casual conversation, observing their surroundings. The landscape is divided into two parts: the dry, brown hills on one side and the lush, green hills on the other. Jig comments that the hills look like white elephants, which she finds amusing, but the American dismisses her comment, indicating a possible disconnect.

The Conversation Unfolds



As the story progresses, the dialogue reveals underlying tensions. The American repeatedly emphasizes how easy the procedure (implied to be an abortion) will be, insisting that it’s a simple, minor operation. He tries to reassure Jig, suggesting that she will feel better afterward and that they can go back to their carefree life.

Jig, on the other hand, exhibits signs of internal conflict. She appears to be pondering the implications of the operation and whether she truly wants it. Her responses are often vague or hesitant, hinting at her ambivalence.

The Symbolism of the Setting and Dialogue



Throughout their conversation, the environment and their words serve as symbols. The hills, especially the white elephants, represent both the burden of their choice and the potential for something valuable or unwanted. The contrasting landscape reflects Jig’s internal struggle—between the desire for independence and the fear of loss.

The Resolution



The story ends with unresolved tension. Jig seems to accept the American’s perspective, agreeing to proceed with the operation, but her silence and the ambiguous ending leave her true feelings open to interpretation. The couple boards the train, leaving their future uncertain.

Characters in Detail



The American



The American is pragmatic, confident, and somewhat dismissive of the gravity of the situation. His words suggest he views the procedure as a simple solution that will allow them to continue their carefree lifestyle. His insistence on the ease of the operation indicates he might be more focused on his own desires than Jig’s emotional needs.

Jig



Jig is emotionally complex. She appears to be conflicted, perhaps feeling guilt, fear, or sadness about the decision she faces. Her comments about the hills and the elephants reveal her subconscious thoughts and her internal battle. She seems to desire a different kind of connection or understanding from the American, but the conversation leaves her uncertain and resigned.

Thematic Analysis



Major Themes



1. Choice and Free Will: The story centers on a pivotal decision—whether Jig should have an abortion or not—and the implications of choosing or refusing. The narrative explores how individuals navigate difficult choices under pressure.

2. Communication and Miscommunication: The couple’s dialogue is marked by subtle hints, implying that words often mask true feelings. The American and Jig struggle to genuinely connect, highlighting the difficulties of honest communication in tense situations.

3. Gender Roles and Power Dynamics: The story subtly reflects gender expectations. Jig’s silence and hesitation may symbolize societal pressures on women regarding reproductive choices, while the American’s assertiveness reflects a male-dominated perspective.

4. The Landscape as a Reflection of Inner State: The contrasting hills symbolize the dichotomy between hope and despair, clarity and confusion, or life and death.

Symbolism



- The Hills: The hills, especially the white elephants, symbolize the burden of the decision. They also symbolize something precious yet unwelcome.
- The White Elephants: Traditionally symbols of rarity or burden, in the story, they represent the unwanted yet valuable nature of the pregnancy.
- The Railroad Tracks and Train: The train signifies the journey, transition, and the inevitability of moving forward, emphasizing the theme of choice and change.
- The Landscape: The contrasting scenery reflects Jig’s internal conflict—her desire for clarity and her ambivalence.

Stylistic Features



Minimalist Language



Hemingway’s hallmark style involves sparse, economical prose that leaves much unsaid, encouraging readers to read between the lines. Dialogue dominates the narrative, and the story’s tone remains restrained and understated.

Use of Dialogue



The story’s power lies in its dialogue, which reveals character personalities, emotional undercurrents, and thematic content without explicit exposition. The conversations are fragmented, mimicking real-life hesitation and ambiguity.

Symbolic Economy



Hemingway employs symbols carefully, ensuring each detail—like the hills or the train—serves a thematic purpose, creating a layered narrative that invites multiple interpretations.

Interpretations and Critical Perspectives



The story’s open-endedness has led to diverse interpretations. Some view it as a straightforward depiction of a couple facing an abortion decision, while others see it as a broader commentary on communication and the human condition.

- Feminist Interpretation: Jig’s internal conflict and lack of agency highlight issues of gender power imbalance and societal pressures on women regarding reproductive rights.
- Existential Perspective: The story reflects the human condition—making choices under uncertainty, with ambiguous consequences.
- Symbolist View: The hills and elephants serve as metaphors for the weight of choices and the complexity of human emotions.

Conclusion



In summary, "Hills Like White Elephants" is a nuanced exploration of difficult choices, communication, and human emotions set against a symbolic landscape. Its minimalist style, layered symbolism, and subtle dialogue make it a compelling work that challenges readers to interpret its meaning actively. The story’s unresolved ending underscores the uncertainty inherent in decision-making, especially concerning sensitive personal issues. Hemingway’s craftsmanship lies in his ability to convey profound themes through simple, precise language and suggestive imagery, making "Hills Like White Elephants" a timeless piece of literary art.

This detailed summary offers an in-depth understanding of the story’s plot, characters, themes, and stylistic features, providing a comprehensive overview for readers seeking to grasp the complexities of Hemingway’s work.

Frequently Asked Questions


What is the main setting of 'Hills Like White Elephants'?

The story is set at a train station in the Ebro River valley of Spain, overlooking hills that resemble white elephants.

Who are the main characters in 'Hills Like White Elephants'?

The main characters are an American man and a girl named Jig, who are traveling together and discussing a sensitive issue.

What is the central conflict in 'Hills Like White Elephants'?

The central conflict revolves around the couple's discussion about whether or not Jig should have an abortion.

What does the title 'Hills Like White Elephants' symbolize in the story?

The hills symbolize the ambiguity and the weight of the decision they face, with some interpretations suggesting they also hint at the unborn child.

How does the story depict the theme of communication?

The story portrays a lack of direct communication, with the characters avoiding discussing their true feelings and the issue at hand openly.

What is the significance of the setting's description in the story?

The setting’s description highlights the contrast between the scenic beauty and the tension in the couple’s conversation, emphasizing themes of choice and uncertainty.

What is Jig's attitude towards the abortion in the story?

Jig appears conflicted and uncertain, showing signs of doubt and emotional struggle about the decision she is being pressured to make.

How does Hemingway use dialogue in 'Hills Like White Elephants'?

Hemingway employs sparse, understated dialogue that reveals the characters' underlying emotions and the tension between them.

What is the story's ending, and what does it imply?

The story ends with the couple waiting for the train, leaving the outcome of their decision ambiguous, which underscores the story's themes of choice and uncertainty.

Why is 'Hills Like White Elephants' considered a classic example of Hemingway's Iceberg Theory?

Because much of the story's meaning is implied through subtle dialogue and description, with the deeper themes submerged beneath the surface, characteristic of Hemingway's iceberg writing style.