---
Understanding the Concept of Secondary Deviance
Defining Primary and Secondary Deviance
To grasp the concept of secondary deviance, it is essential to differentiate it from primary deviance.
- Primary Deviance refers to minor, often isolated acts of deviance that do not result in a significant impact on an individual's self-identity or social standing. Examples include occasional truancy, petty theft, or experimenting with drugs without societal labels attaching to the individual.
- Secondary Deviance occurs when an individual’s deviant behavior becomes a part of their self-identity after being labeled as deviant by society or social institutions. This label influences subsequent behavior, often leading to a cycle of continued deviance.
The Process of Secondary Deviance
The process typically unfolds in several stages:
1. Initial Deviant Act: An individual commits an act that is considered deviant by societal standards.
2. Societal Reaction: Authorities or society at large respond through labeling, stigmatization, or punishment.
3. Labeling: The individual is officially or informally labeled as a deviant, which may include formal sanctions like arrest or informal reactions such as gossip.
4. Internalization of Label: The individual begins to accept this label as part of their identity.
5. Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: The individual’s behavior aligns with the deviant label, leading to further deviant acts, reinforcing their deviant identity.
This cycle highlights how societal reactions can influence personal identity and behavior, leading to secondary deviance.
---
Historical and Theoretical Foundations
Labeling Theory
The concept of secondary deviance is rooted in labeling theory, a sociological perspective that emphasizes the significance of societal reactions to deviance.
- Developed prominently by sociologists Howard Becker and Edwin Lemert.
- Argues that deviance is not inherent in an act but results from the social response to that act.
- Labels assigned to individuals can influence their self-identity, leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Edwin Lemert’s Contribution
Edwin Lemert distinguished between primary and secondary deviance:
- Primary Deviance: Acts that are occasional and not tied to the individual’s self-identity.
- Secondary Deviance: The consequence of societal reactions that lead to a change in self-perception and further deviant behavior.
Lemert emphasized that the social labeling process can be a powerful force in shaping an individual's future behavior, especially when the label becomes a defining feature of their identity.
---
Examples of Secondary Deviance
Understanding secondary deviance is facilitated through real-world examples across different contexts:
- Juvenile Delinquency: A teenager caught vandalizing property may be labeled as a troublemaker. If society responds with harsh punishment and stigmatization, the teen might internalize this label, leading to continued delinquent behavior.
- Substance Abuse: An individual who attempts recreational drug use and is caught might be labeled as a drug addict. This label could influence their self-image, resulting in a belief that they are inherently deviant, potentially leading to more frequent or serious drug use.
- Criminal Convictions: A person convicted of a crime may face social exclusion and stigmatization, which can foster resentment or marginalization, increasing the likelihood of reoffending.
- Mental Health Stigma: Someone diagnosed with a mental illness might be labeled as "mentally unstable," which could influence their interactions and self-esteem, possibly leading to behaviors that reinforce societal stereotypes.
---
The Impact of Secondary Deviance
On Individuals
Secondary deviance can significantly affect individuals in multiple ways:
- Identity Shift: They may begin to see themselves solely through the lens of their deviant label.
- Reduced Opportunities: Stigmatization can limit access to employment, education, and social relationships.
- Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: The internalization of the deviant label may lead individuals to conform even more to deviant behaviors.
- Marginalization and Exclusion: Social rejection can deepen their involvement in deviant subcultures.
On Society
The societal implications include:
- Reinforcement of Stereotypes: Labels can perpetuate negative stereotypes about certain groups.
- Criminal Justice Implications: Over-reliance on punitive measures can exacerbate the cycle of deviance.
- Policy Challenges: Designing effective interventions requires understanding the social dynamics of labeling and secondary deviance.
---
Factors Contributing to Secondary Deviance
Several factors influence whether primary deviance evolves into secondary deviance:
- Severity of the Label: Harsh or stigmatizing labels tend to have a stronger impact.
- Societal Response: Supportive versus punitive reactions can influence outcomes.
- Personal Resilience: An individual’s self-esteem and social support networks can mitigate the effects of labeling.
- Community and Cultural Context: Cultural norms and community attitudes can either reinforce or challenge labels.
- Institutional Policies: The approach taken by institutions like schools, courts, and social services plays a role.
---
Prevention and Intervention Strategies
To reduce secondary deviance, multiple strategies can be employed:
- Decriminalization and Diversion Programs: Focus on rehabilitative rather than punitive responses to primary deviant acts.
- Restorative Justice: Emphasizes repairing harm and reintegrating offenders into society.
- Positive Labeling: Encouraging labels that recognize potential for change and growth.
- Social Support Systems: Providing counseling, education, and employment opportunities.
- Community-Based Programs: Engaging communities to challenge stigmatization and promote inclusive attitudes.
---
Criticisms and Limitations of the Concept
While the concept of secondary deviance provides valuable insights, it also faces criticisms:
- Determinism: Overemphasis on labeling may ignore individual agency.
- Causality Issues: Difficult to establish whether societal reaction causes deviance or if the deviant act was already part of the individual’s identity.
- Cultural Bias: Definitions of deviance and the impact of labels vary across cultures.
- Neglect of Structural Factors: Focus on individual labeling may overlook broader social inequalities and systemic issues.
---
Conclusion
Secondary deviance plays a pivotal role in understanding how social reactions and labeling influence individual behavior and identity. It underscores the importance of societal attitudes and responses in either perpetuating or mitigating deviance. By recognizing the processes involved in secondary deviance, policymakers, educators, and social workers can develop more effective strategies to prevent the cycle of deviance and promote social reintegration. Emphasizing rehabilitative approaches and reducing stigmatization are crucial steps toward fostering inclusive communities that support positive change, ultimately breaking the cycle of secondary deviance and enhancing social cohesion.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is secondary deviance?
Secondary deviance refers to the behavior that results from society's reaction to an individual's initial deviant act, leading the individual to adopt a deviant identity and continue engaging in deviant behavior.
How does secondary deviance differ from primary deviance?
Primary deviance involves minor or occasional rule-breaking that doesn't affect one's self-identity, while secondary deviance occurs after societal labels are applied, leading the individual to see themselves as deviant and continue the behavior.
What causes secondary deviance?
Secondary deviance is often caused by societal labeling, stigma, and the individual's internalization of these labels, which can lead to a self-fulfilling cycle of continued deviant behavior.
Can secondary deviance be reversed?
Yes, secondary deviance can be reversed or mitigated through de-labeling, positive social support, and rehabilitation efforts that help individuals redefine their identities.
Which sociological theories explain secondary deviance?
Labeling theory and social reaction theory primarily explain secondary deviance, emphasizing how societal reactions and labels influence individual behavior.
Is secondary deviance a conscious choice?
Secondary deviance is often a result of societal reactions and internalization of labels, rather than a purely conscious choice, though individuals may also consciously adopt deviant roles.
How does society contribute to secondary deviance?
Society contributes through stigmatization, labeling, and marginalization, which can push individuals further into deviant roles and reinforce their deviant identity.
What role does self-identity play in secondary deviance?
Self-identity plays a crucial role, as individuals may begin to see themselves as deviant due to societal labels, which sustains and perpetuates deviant behavior.
Can understanding secondary deviance help in criminal rehabilitation?
Yes, understanding secondary deviance can inform rehabilitation efforts by addressing societal labels, supporting positive identity formation, and reducing stigmatization.
Is secondary deviance related to the concept of master status?
Yes, secondary deviance is often associated with the master status, where the deviant label becomes the primary way an individual is identified and treated by society.
