Agatha Christie's "Murder on the Orient Express" is one of her most celebrated works, captivating readers with its intricate plot, compelling characters, and masterful storytelling. At the heart of this classic mystery lies a question that has intrigued readers for decades: who is the murderer in "Murder on the Orient Express"? The novel's core revolves around the murder of Samuel Ratchett and the subsequent investigation led by the legendary detective Hercule Poirot. Unraveling the identity of the murderer requires examining the plot, the characters involved, and the thematic elements that Christie weaves throughout the narrative.
---
The Setting and The Crime
The Enclosed Environment
The story unfolds aboard the famous luxury train, the Orient Express, which travels from Istanbul to Calais. The train's confined space creates a closed-circle mystery, where the list of suspects is limited to the passengers and crew present on the train. This setting amplifies the suspense, as everyone is a potential culprit, and the limited escape routes heighten the tension.
The Murder of Samuel Ratchett
Samuel Ratchett, an American businessman with a shady past, is found stabbed multiple times in his compartment. The murder appears to be meticulously planned, with no signs of forced entry or struggle. The crime occurs during the night, and the detective Hercule Poirot is called upon to solve the case.
---
The Investigation and Key Clues
Hercule Poirot's Approach
Poirot meticulously interviews each passenger and crew member, gathering alibis, motives, and insights. His keen observation skills and logical reasoning lead him through a labyrinth of clues and false leads.
Important Clues Discovered
- The number of stab wounds corresponds to the number of suspects involved.
- The presence of a torn train timetable and a child's doll suggests a connection to the victim.
- Several passengers have motives linked to past crimes or personal grievances.
- The absence of a clear alibi for multiple suspects raises suspicion.
---
The Identity of the Murderer
The Conventional Answer
Initially, one might think the murderer is a single individual acting alone. However, as Poirot unravels the case, he uncovers a complex web of collaboration among the passengers.
The Collective Justice
In a groundbreaking conclusion, Poirot reveals that the murder was a collective act. The passengers involved in the crime are:
- Suspects involved:
1. Hector MacQueen
2. Princess Dragomiroff
3. Count Andrenyi and his wife, Countess Helena
4. Mrs. Hubbard
5. Mrs. Ellen Dorothea "Daisy" Armstrong (through her daughter)
6. Cyrus Hardman
7. Antonio Foscarelli
8. Greta Ohlsson
9. Samuel Ratchett himself (as an accomplice)
- The motive:
The passengers are connected through a tragic past involving the kidnapping and murder of Daisy Armstrong, a young girl. Samuel Ratchett was revealed to be a criminal who had previously kidnapped and murdered Daisy Armstrong. The suspects, all of whom had personal grievances against Ratchett, conspired to kill him as an act of collective justice.
---
The Motive and Justice in the Novel
The Backstory of Daisy Armstrong
The case gains its emotional depth through the backstory of Daisy Armstrong, whose kidnapping and murder shocked society. Several passengers are connected to her tragic story, either directly or indirectly.
The Criminal's True Identity
It is revealed that Ratchett was actually a notorious criminal named Cassetti. His past crimes had caused immense suffering, and the passengers' collective conscience demanded retribution.
The Moral Dilemma
Christie explores themes of justice, morality, and revenge. The passengers' decision to murder Ratchett collectively raises questions about the ethics of vigilante justice versus legal justice.
---
Conclusion: The Verdict
The Final Revelation
Hercule Poirot deduces that all the passengers, except for the conductor and the train staff, are complicit in the murder. They each took turns stabbing Ratchett, matching the number of wounds found on his body. The act was a coordinated response to the injustice he inflicted on the Armstrong family.
The Ethical Reflection
While Poirot recognizes the moral complexity of the situation, he ultimately recommends that the authorities accept the collective justice served by the passengers. The novel ends with a reflection on the nature of justice, revenge, and moral responsibility.
---
Summary
- The murderer in "Murder on the Orient Express" is not a single individual but a collective group of passengers.
- They conspired to murder Samuel Ratchett (who was Cassetti) as an act of revenge for the kidnapping and murder of Daisy Armstrong.
- Hercule Poirot uncovers the truth through meticulous investigation, revealing the passengers' shared moral stance.
- The novel challenges traditional notions of justice, leaving readers contemplating the ethics of vigilante acts.
---
Final Thoughts
Agatha Christie's masterful storytelling in "Murder on the Orient Express" not only delivers a compelling mystery but also explores profound themes about morality, justice, and human nature. The collective act of murder committed by the passengers serves as a powerful narrative device to question whether justice can or should be administered outside the bounds of law. The novel remains a timeless classic precisely because it invites readers to ponder the complex moral questions it raises, making the answer to "who is the murderer?" surprisingly nuanced and thought-provoking.
---
Note: The detailed understanding of the plot reveals that the 'murderer' is a group of individuals acting together, rather than a single person, which is a distinctive feature of this novel's resolution.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is the murderer in 'Murder on the Orient Express'?
The murderer is all the passengers involved—each of the twelve suspects conspired to kill the victim, Ratchett, as an act of collective justice.
Why did the passengers conspire to kill Ratchett in 'Murder on the Orient Express'?
They believed Ratchett, whose real name was Cassetti, was responsible for kidnapping and murdering a young girl, and they felt compelled to avenge her by killing him.
Is the murderer in 'Murder on the Orient Express' a single person or multiple people?
Multiple passengers collaborated in the murder, each taking part in the act, making it a collective effort rather than a single murderer.
How does Hercule Poirot uncover the identity of the murderer in 'Murder on the Orient Express'?
Poirot investigates the clues and testimonies, discovering the conspiracy among the suspects and realizing that they all participated in the murder to punish Ratchett for his past crimes.
Does 'Murder on the Orient Express' have a definitive murderer, or is it an open-ended case?
The story concludes with the revelation that all twelve suspects are complicit, making it a unique case where the collective justice replaces traditional single-murderer resolution.
What motivates the suspects in 'Murder on the Orient Express' to participate in the murder?
They are motivated by a shared sense of moral outrage, believing that Ratchett's past crimes warranted retribution, leading them to take justice into their own hands.
Was the murder in 'Murder on the Orient Express' premeditated or spontaneous?
It was premeditated, as the suspects carefully planned and coordinated the murder to ensure justice was served for Ratchett's previous crimes.
